The
Labyrinth
by Aurel Antonie
On
my left there is a wall which I keep touching with my hand. It is my
only chance to find the way out of the labyrinth. I must keep my
palm close to the left wall all the time, while moving forward. This
is a guaranteed, found out by some mathematician or maze specialist,
but not yet tested. Maybe they verified it by mathematical rules or
calculations, or they checked ………. labyrinth drawn on paper. But in
point of practice, no one has ever walked blindly in a labyrinth,
looking for a way out, with no other hope than the boundless trust
in this principle. I actually do not confide in it but,
unfortunately, I have no other chance. I am aware of no other way
to get out of an unknown maze.
I
have not even a map with me. But how could I be supposed to have a
map, since I have not entered here for a pleasure trip. Or at least
to have a ball of thread like Theseus, in point of fact even that
thread, no matter how useful, has still an undeniable disadvantage.
That thread links you to the outside world and you run the risk that
a practical joker or a malicious person might cut it and then you
are entirely lost. You shall no longer find the way cut in a
thousand years. Or the thread might just break being worn out by
rubbing against those coarse walls.
I
think that the trick discovered by this mathematician is more
useful. You keep your hand close to a wall and walk. And you don’t
get away from that wall until you reach a way out. If there is a way
out. But there certainly is! All mazes have way out. But what if
I’ve never heard, that does not mean that there is no such a maze.
Yet, I don’t think that the bad luck of running across such a
labyrinth has befallen me. One may at least come out from the same
spot where one has come in! A labyrinth without a way out would be a
labyrinth without a way in, and such a labyrinth does not exist. You
state again that it doesn’t exist! But Kelvin used to say… May
Kelvin be thrice accursed! For he is the one who got me into
trouble. With his morbid imagination, he talked me into coming to
see the Gate of the Sun. That happened yesterday, if my watch is
still going right.
We
left together in the desert, yesterday morning. Out of the blue,
Kelvin, who writes all sort of fantastic stories, began to speak
about the labyrinth. This did not surprise me. It is customary with
him. And moreover, there was a long way ahead of us and his stories
made the time slip by. It is quite a blessing to have such a
story-teller during a long journey. It is a blessing, if he confines
to story-telling, but it is actually a curse if his weird fantasies
materialize and you enter his tortuous world, hard to control.
I still cannot
understand why have I accepted to join him in that absurd adventure.
And yet, when he explained to me what was to be done, everything
seemed so simple. We were supposed to cross the Red Desert in order
to get to see the Gate of the Sun, which is bewitching. Where had he
heard that? He had seen it many times in his imagination, or in a
dream, or in a similar state of mind. It seems that such states are
quite frequent with him. In his mind, the place where the gate was
standing was so well established that he convinced me. And yet, I
still don’t understand how I could agree to go to a place which
exist only in the imagination of a guy like Kelvin. But this person
exerts an unaccountable fascination on me.
“Don’t you feel that the labyrinth is emerging from the ground?” he
asked me unexpectedly.
“I
don’t feel anything,” I answered, staring at the boundless desert.
Then I looked at him, but I didn’t like his expression at all. He
seemed to have fallen into a trance.
“But it is emerging and surrounding us,” Kelvin persisted. “It often
happens to me. I would sometimes wander for days in the maze,
looking for a way out, but it seems that no way leads anywhere and I
simply lose patience, though I try to keep my self-control. But one
morning there rises that huge chronometer which replaces my sun and
the labyrinth gets underground, it disappears, you see?”
“No, I don’t.”
“You know,” he resumed imperturbably. “I sometimes feel that I’ve
been spending more time than was my due, that I’ve used a time that
wasn’t mine. And this spell of time is taken away from my life. My
life is shortened by that time abusively spent. This usually happens
when I am creating. When time disappears and I think that the hands
of my chronometer stand still. But this is not so. I use to create
at night, because at night I get rid of the obsession of the
chronometer and I feel that time expands and night may last for
ever. But in the morning, when the chronometer rises and I may see
its hands, I see that I have stolen days, sometimes whole months and
I am frightened. I am afraid that I shall have to pay sometime for
all that stolen time. My only chance would be immortality. But who
would think that I am immortal? I do not fully believe it myself. If
those around me would truly think that I am immortal, I could
certainly be so. But people doubt it and their doubts rob me of
life. If only they might believe in what I am writing. But they do
not take it for true. Actually I think that they do not put faith in
anything. They have lost their faith. They no longer believe in
themselves, let alone in me or in my writings. Yet it seems that I
need them, since when their indifference reaches a climax, the
labyrinth which surrounds me rushes at me. And then I lose touch
with people, because in that labyrinth there is no one. And I keep
wandering in it for days on end, losing my confidence in everything
that exist. I no longer trust my very life, as it is. And after long
lasting searches and uncertainties, one morning there rise the
chronometer which calmly announces me that it has robbed me of some
other months from my life. The labyrinth, the art, people’s
distrust, my own distrust, all these rob me, deprive me of life, so
that I feel that my life has gone long ago and that I am in god’s
debt for two or three lives. And then I start thinking again that I
am immortal and the cycle resumes. Just now I am feeling that the
labyrinth is emerging from the ground and separates me from you. The
labyrinth had never surrounded me when I went to the Gate of the
Sun. I think that you alone are to blame. I shouldn’t have taken you
with me.”
I
tired to tell him that I was seeing no maze and that it was not my
fault that I was roaming that unfriendly desert. But while I was
speaking to him, damn it all, he was moving away ever faster, so
that I could no longer keep pace with him. And he got himself lost.
I
walked all by myself up to the evening. I looked for Kelvin for a
while, then I sought after the way back. I went to sleep at night in
the desert and in the morning. I woke up inside the labyrinth. As
easy as ABC! I think there is no easier way of getting into trouble…
In actual fact, logically thinking, I don’t think that it was the
labyrinth which came over me. It seems much more plausible that I
should have entered it last night, after sunset, when I was
wandering around giddily, without knowing too well which way I went.
And I probably slept in the labyrinth, not in the desert. As a
matter of fact, the distinction is not essential since, in the last
analysis, the desert is the highest expression of the labyrinth, as
you cannot get out of it by touching a wall with your left hand all
the time. At any rate, it is better to be in a labyrinth. Especially
when you are aware of the rule of getting out, as I am.
I
know another rule as well, invented also by those students of
labyrinths, but equally untested. You are supposed to draw a solid
line on one of the walls. If you pass a second time through a
gallery having such a line, you draw another line on the opposite
wall. You should never pass through a corridor where there already
are two lines. As simple as anything. This is quite useful when you
wish to find at all costs any cul-de-sac or dead end, which might
shelter a treasure or a hungry Minotaur. I think that this rule
would have been quite useful for Theseus, but not for me, since I
look for nothing, I just want to get out.
What a strange construction, this labyrinth is! Whoever could have
devised it? Fancy that! It was Daedalus, that guy so full of useless
ideas. I don’t know what possessed him! To make such a tortuous
construction, just for confining an animal inside. Couldn’t
he make a solid cage instead? Well, since he made no cage but a
labyrinth, it means that things could not be done otherwise. As a
matter of fact, what do I know about those times, and, in general,
what do I know about labyrinth? And, even if I know, what would be
the use? Could I get out faster from here? Possibly, it I might
grasp the essence of the labyrinth and its purpose.
Any construction has a practical and immediate purpose. Only the
labyrinth has such an absurd design, that I am induced to think that
it was erected as a monument to the absurd, and yet, at the time
when it was built, people could not afford to spend so much energy
and money just for erecting a monument to the absurd, which we are
not sure that they perceived as such.
Daedalus built the Labyrinth just in order to imprison an ox. I
can’t get this out of my mind. What lie hidden behind that story? I
should not forget that it was also Daedalus who devised those
calamitous wings for Icarus. I think that the guy was a genius of
evil and that he turned people’s heads with his strange ideas. And
yet, the animal shut up in the labyrinth was a Minotaur.
Minos’s illegitimate son.
That’s the point ! The Minotaut represented the fault, the sin,
which was to be concealed from the eyes of the other people and
which had also to be prevented from rushing among them and from
contaminating them. But in order to imprison a concept so
overwhelmingly powerful as the fault or the sin, no wall is thick
enough. And then Daedalus resorted to that awful snare. For it is an
inconceivably refines snare.
In
actual fact, the Minotaur was not imprisoned. It was not prevented
to walk, to run, to look for a way out. It preserved the illusion of
complete liberty. It was faced by miles and miles of galleries,
which provided an almost endless number of options. And, since it
had access to the corridors, the Minotaur felt no urge to break the
side walls, which probably could not have resisted unusual strength.
What a victory of intelligence over brutal force! That Daedalus sure
was an extremely imaginative fellow! I ought to have taken his
advice, before getting among those endless walls. Oh, no. I think
that our talk would have been pointless, if he was like Kelvin. And
they seem very much alike. The same unusual imagination. As if they
were aliens.
Nevertheless, the labyrinth is still a great question. Whence does
it come and what does it mean? It is a strange concept for human
nature. In this concept there is something which exceeds the
creative imagination of a man. Of a normal man, but not of someone
like Kelvin or like Daedalus.
Kelvin should have roamed through this labyrinth, which is better
suited to him mental structure. But what if he is bustling somewhere
nearby and you might bump into him, at a turn of those tortuous
corridors. Let Kelvin alone. He already has his mental mazes, from
where he cannot get out. He has no need of this material labyrinth.
O, but I want him to be with me, since he got me into this scrape
and he is the one who should help me out of it. You’re wrong. No one
will get you out of this place, if you don’t succeed in getting out
by yourself. And you won’t succeed, until you find the essence of
the labyrinth. Its meaning.
I
ought to try to think like Daedalus’s contemporaries. It’s
difficult. How am I to change my educated, logical thinking into
their direct and instinctual way of reasoning? O, but I can. I don’t
think I am structurally different from them. And this is the proof:
I am not able to solve a problem posed by one of them.
The purpose of any labyrinth is to be solved. To pass through it and
to find your way out. Or you may pass by it and ignore it and then
the labyrinth ceases to exist. Especially if it is ignored by most
people. To say nothing of the case when everybody ignores it. This
makes me think that the Minotaur did not exist either. It was
invented by Daedalus to make people solve the labyrinth. To draw
their attention to it. To prevent their ignoring it. To give a human
meaning to an inhuman construction or building. People had no wish
to solve a problem without a practical and immediate end. Why should
a man enter the labyrinth when he could simply ignore it and mind
his own business? But, knowing that the building imprisons a force,
a brutal force which may get out and destroy everything, people
start being interested in the walls that protect them against that
force. Would the problem of the labyrinth concern me, hadn’t I been
inside, obliged to find its issue? I don’t think so.
I
have learned about the Labyrinth from the legend of the Minotaur,
then, quite accidentally, in a journal, I have come across a
communication presented by a young scientist at an international
congress of psychology. The young man made some mice enter a maze.
The food was placed at the opposite end, so that the mice had to
find the right way through the maze, in order to reach it. In the
initial phase, out of 169 mice only one succeeded in finding the
food and in surviving. The others were starved to death, straying
through the paths of the maze. The offspring of those that could
find the food were submitted to the same test and after chat tough
selection, only those endowed with that special ability survived.
After fourteen generations, the error decreased from 168 to two
only. The young scientist who described his experiment drew a
disturbing conclusion, concerning the social conduct controlled by
transmitting to the offspring the newly acquired social habits.
After that communication, another scientist repeated the experiment,
which was a failure. He then publicly accused the young man of being
an impostor and the young man committed suicide. The scientist who
had blamed him carried cut the test again and this time he got the
same findings as the young scientist. The story is quite strange and
I might have forgotten it, hadn’t I been so impressed by the fate of
the young scientist. It was in the same paper that I read about the
method used to find the way out of an unknown labyrinth.
As
a matter of fact, that rule is a nonsense. I have been walking for
ages keeping my hand close to that coarse wall and there is no glint
of hope of finding the way out. The mathematician, with his rule of
the labyrinth, was in the wrong. How could he be wrong? He cannot be
wrong! He can’t leave me in the lurch just now, when I need his
theory! What is the use of knowing how to go out of a labyrinth, if
in practice I can’t do it? It goes without saying that a problem is
of interest to you only when you are actually confronted by it.
Otherwise you may think of it as an abstraction and you may solve it
theoretically at most, like that scientist with the rule of the
labyrinth.
But what if this labyrinth is endless? There are no endless
labyrinths. You don’t say so! Just think of an endless wall, which
you keep hugging but cannot reach its end. There are no endless
walls. Not even the Chinese wall is endless, though it is the only
construction visible from the Moon. Hence we are speaking of an
endless labyrinth within a limited space. This is hard to achieve.
Hard, but not impossible. An endless labyrinth actually is a
labyrinth without solution, which has no way out. You can’t walk out
of it, because it keeps changing the shape and place of its
corridors, while you are inside. A modular labyrinth, whose modules
are joined in an endless variety of ways. Or a labyrinth with doors,
where every door opens one-way only, without allowing coming back on
the same way. If you take the wrong way, you find yourself in a
closed gallery and can no longer leave it. But that would be a
labyrinth which kills. There is no need of such a labyrinth. You may
wander through a labyrinth like that of Daedalus to the end of you
life without finding any way out, if you don’t know the rule of
keeping your hand close to the wall. But I do know it and I shall go
out. Especially if I am to find out the essence of the labyrinth. I
think that the only labyrinth which no issue is the labyrinth which
you do not wish to leave.
If
I come to think of it, I feel that essential element in defining the
labyrinth is its very unique character. One man created one
labyrinth only and mankind will go on speaking about it for ever.
After that brilliant idea had struck Daedalus it is much easier to
construct another labyrinth, than to grasp its essence. I wonder
whether I would set myself to construct a labyrinth. I don‘t think
so. Another labyrinth would merely copy the first one, which is
unique and unattainable.
What would crown all
is my meeting that animal, supposing it is still here. But this is
not possible. According to legend, it was slain by Theseus, the man
with the ball of thread. But are those legends to be trusted? I am
not quite sure that the young man killed that ox. Maybe he did not
even meet it. This is not out of the question, account being taken
of the great complexity of the labyrinth. You may place one hundred
individuals inside and there is a good chance that they will walk
for weeks on end without meeting one another. In actual fact, no one
ever saw the dead animal. They purely trusted that adventurer. How
gullible people were! Not to check up! That was the first thing to
do! But who was to do it? Who was bold enough to enter that
lair-labyrinth? It was much more convenient to take it for granted.
But, even it he had killed that beast, it is not certain that the
monster had left no offspring or some other beings. Or, even more
likely, people should have placed another animal inside and they are
waiting to see how I am to find my way about it.
How annoying! Now I am going to be obsessed by the presence of an
animal confined here. With me. Maybe for quite a long time. Bored
and eager to find some diversion. And precisely I am the one to keep
it company. What bad luck! It is my sincere opinion that Theseus
stood somewhere near the entrance. He was certainly not mad enough
to creep into rat holes, just to meet the monster. He then went out,
told a lie and became a hero. What an artful guy! While I was
simple-minded enough to set myself to roam through those caves and
to keep touching the walls. Or perhaps people realized that Theseus
had cheated them and that is why they placed me here to finish his
job. But they could have informed me of it, a least. So that I could
have taken with me a weapon or something. A weapon and a ball of
thread. How strange!
It
goes without saying that Theseus took Daedalus’s advice, before he
ventured into this place. And Daedalus would have certainly
described the structure of the labyrinth for hours on end. But when
he saw the idiotic way in which Theseus stared at the plan of the
construction, he sighed and gave him that thread which became
famous. According to legend it was a woman who had given it to him.
That legend was written by a woman. To be sure.
I
think that same ball of thread was used somewhat later to make the
Gordian Knot, after it got quite entangled by Theseus in the
labyrinth. And then, as it stands to reason, a neurotic fellow came
and cut it with his sword. Simply and efficiently. But things are
somewhat harder, in the case of a labyrinth. One cannot seven it
pure and simple, with a whistling sword. Nor can you take a pick
axe, like a jobber, and start pulling down the walls, one after
another. This is a Sysiphean labour and it is everlasting, since the
problem of the labyrinth cannot be solved by digging a mole hole in
it. The same as the question of the Gordian Knot was not solved
either. To solve a labyrinth one needs calm. Calm and patience.
Nevertheless, they could have made a smaller labyrinth. What’s the
use of so many hundreds of miles of winding paths and of so many
thousands of crossings and forkings? But they couldn’t make a small
labyrinth. The labyrinth poses or solves a fundamental question. A
small labyrinth does not pose and does not solve any problem. Such a
labyrinth could have been quite easily assimilated by people.
Logically speaking, a labyrinth is a construction which you enter
and then try to leave as quickly as possible. This is again a
contradiction, but it is true. Once you enter it, you are faced with
several variants and you are free to choose one all by yourself. You
alone! The Minotaur was also alone, the same as Theseus and I. And
the winder the range of options, the more intricate it is, since
only one choice provides the chance of finding the way out. The
chance! This is the meaning of the labyrinth. Its essence. We are
all in a labyrinth. Some are more proficient, others are less well
equipped, but all are looking for a way out. The chance of finding
it the same for all, but its very essence makes it available only
for very few.
Now I am afraid that I shall never be able to find the way out and
that I’ve lost my chance by applying that uncertain rule, of keeping
the hand close to the wall. I think that every one is frightened and
that the Minotaur did never exist. It symbolized only the natural
fear of every man faced with a labyrinth he did not understand. That
fear was materialized in that beast. Daedalus himself was afraid. He
was the most frightened of all. And he materialized his fear in that
impossible labyrinth. It is man’s natural reaction to the presence
of a higher force, which he is afraid of and which may vanquish him.
And since the only chance of the vanquished is not to accept the
idea of defeat, he transposes the fight on a spiritual level and
creates the labyrinth. Daedalus conceals his fear in this labyrinth
which one cannot leave. Neither he, nor his fear. Then each one
tries to find a way out, hoping to leave the other one inside.
Everybody cherishes the hope of being lucky enough to be saved but
my chance is the same as that of Kelvin or Theseus, the same as that
of all those who wandered or will wander trough a labyrinth, without
finding a way out. As a matter of fact, the chance is just an
illusion, created to gather every one here within the walls of the
labyrinth.
Yet, no matter how many thoughts I have, my condition is just the
same. I am a man who has been walking for days or years on end,
keeping his left hand close to the wall of the labyrinth and moving
forward with the foolish hope that he will succeed in going out of
it. Out, where the only thing waiting for me is the desert, which is
a labyrinth essentialized to the absurd. And which you cannot leave,
helped by any rule. Then why should I find a way out? Just for
entering a labyrinth even more intricate than this one? A least here
I have the possibility to choose between two or several galleries
which are crossing or bifurcating. While outside, in the desert,
pathways are numberless and endless. Here I have the opportunity to
chose, since in any situation there are at least two options, and
you may choose what is more convenient for you. The Chinese used to
say that out of thirty-six possibilities, one should choose flight.
How nice. To start running. Maybe it is convenient there, but here
to run means to get away from the left wall and to lose your last
chance of finding the way out.
And this absolute solitude where roaming through the corridors
becomes an obsession. I think that I have secluded myself from the
other people just because of that fixed idea of finding a way out of
here. It secluded me from Kelvin giddy and dreamy as he was, but the
only man I could speak with. In an endless labyrinth, you always
need someone like Kelvin.
This is actually a huge and senseless game, whose rules I know but
will no longer observe. I’ve covered enough miles. I’ve touched the
coarse walls of the labyrinth quite enough. It’s over now. I want to
be left alone with myself and regain myself.
The man took away his left hand from the wall and went off calmly.
He walked engrossed in thought, his hands in his pockets, through
the corridors that appeared and intersected in front of him. He met
people. Some were drawing lines or various cabbalistic signs on the
walls, others kept their left hand close to the wall, walking with a
senseless hope in their eyes, others were running at random and all
passed by the others without seeing one another. Nor did they see
the man who passed them, indifferent to all, with his hands in his
pockets and a bitter smile in the corner of his mouth.
Translated by Sorana Georgescu-Gorjan
|